On
this very blog, there have been a few postings regarding mobile games.
Anyone who reads them would probably get a good idea of my stance on
such forms of entertainment. I'd like to say that my experience of
mobile
gaming was positive over all, or that I'm excited about the prospect of
more such games to come, or that these smaller games would make a good
compliment to the bigger games I play today. I want to say that I'm
open to apps and mobile games, but, unlike Luke
Skywalker, deep down inside I know that's just not true. The following
story should illustrate the point. Since most of the participants'
names start with 'J' and since they are all co workers, I'd rather not
use real names. Instead, I'd call them 'J-girl',
'J-guy' and 'J-dude'.
So
here I was at work, and on my way to deliver some documents to another
group. I caught J-guy and J-girl chatting about iPhone games. Knowing
that I'm a big gamer, J-girl turns to me and says:
"Hey, have you heard of this game called Nemo's Reef?"
That
innocent remark was enough to stop me in my tracks. I literally stared
at her and took a step back, like she just offered me a box of cancer
sticks. I said, "Um… I don't do those."
There
was a brief awkward moment where J-girl shot daggers at me with her
eyes before J-guy says: "You could have been nicer about it."
Which is true, I could have, had the question came so suddenly, I was caught in the headlights. There was no place to run.
J-girl: "Well, the game lets you build a reef, and you have to spend real money to buy stuff like pearls and…"
I
forgot most of what she said, but I saw my way out. "Um… see, that's
why I'm not into those things." It was a feeble excuse, and I know it.
While it's true enough that microtransactions don't do much for me,
it's
not exactly a dealer breaker IF I really like a particular game. I've
'invested' before in Dungeon Hunter…
It
was then that rescue came from the form of J-dude. He was passing by
when he heard J-girl's explaination and nochalantely added, "Those
Android apps aren't real games. Just something to play for five minutes
while
waiting in line." Bless you, J-dude, bless you! The man took the
words right out of my mouth, words that I was too scared to say but felt
deep within my being. Like Luke Skywalker, deep down inside, I know
this to be true.
With
J-dude on my side, I was able to snap out of my embarrassment and
scurried off like a squirrel with a peanut. But this exchange taught me
something about my true feelings on mobile games. Which is to say that I think they
are
rather shallow. And this reminds me of something else. A short while I
after the incident above, I started and finished a book called The Shallows. The
author was writing about the way the Internet literally changes the
brain to think a different way. There were a lot
of comparisons to reading. By reading, I mean reading books. It's no
secret that web surfers do a lot of reading, same with avid book lovers
(such as myself). Yet, the type of reading is totally different.
Rather than deep reading required by traditional
paper bound works, the internet with it's myriad of links is more 'back
and forth' and more fragmented in its presentation of information.
The author of The Shallows concluded that web lovers are more capable of
multitasking, but the trade off is that they
become unable to focus on any one thing. Book readers are the
opposite, featuring laserlike focusing abilities but perhaps not so much
good at doing more than a couple things at once. That is also why the
book's title is what it is, because Internet use involves
a more shallow way to use our brains and memories. They are great at
picking out info by skimming the top, but not so much when deeper
research is required.
This
is generalization, mind you. There will always be people more
scatterbrained than others, without or without the internet but this is
one analogy. And I find the same when it comes to mobile games versus
traditional
PC and console fare. A game that is meant to be played four or five
minutes at a time is the definition of shallow and the proof is in the
game itself. My girlfriend recently told me about a mobile game she
played called "Candy Crush". From what I've seen,
it like a puzzle game, like Tetris. The game itself comes with
five lives and once those are gone, you cannot play anymore. To keep
playing, you must go on Facebook and ask other users for more lives.
Otherwise, you will have to wait for a specific amount
of time to pass before gaining lives back. So the game itself comes
with a caveat that it cannot be played for a long stretch. It was
designed that way!
I
can't help but make the analogy that mobile is to consoles as the
internet is to books. One is the shallower experience than the other.
Yet, I don't think I can ever play mobile games with the same enjoyment
as I
do on my consoles. There's no way I can ever enjoy games like Candy Crush. But I'm a bit scared that, by closing off the mobile door this
way, it might make me, too, a little bit shallow.
Gaming Update:
Ni no Kuni: Done! After over 50 hours! Absolutely fantastic game. I wish it wasn't so long, but now that it's done, I miss it. Such light hearted fare comes along far too rarely these days.
DMC: Started this again, from scratch, now that Ni no Kuni is done.
Fire Emblem Awakening: Great game, and still working on it on my commutes and such.
Yes, try not to close the door, okay? :) Because... you know I'll try to force it open again :D
ReplyDeleteI personally think that mobile / Facebook app games are designed with limited lives / energy use for two main reasons:
ReplyDelete1. To encourage users to get their friends to play and possibly get more free lives (I'm of the impression that a Facebook app game's "success ranking" comes from how many people play. And of course, the more who play, the better chance that one of them will spend real money on the game.
2. To get users to pay real money, if they simply can't wait.
While I generally agree that mobile / Facebook app games tend toward the "shallow" side, something to consider would be the developing budget on those games -- I'm guessing it's much smaller than the budget for a console / handheld game.
Also, for free games, there has to be some way for the company to earn some kind of revenue. Server costs are expensive, I'm sure.
And yeah, don't shut that door. You never know when something awesome might come along. I mean, The Walking Dead was released for the iPhone, so technically, it's a mobile game as well as a console game, right? :p